On April 19, 2024, the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules decided not to enact new rules regarding AI-generated evidence, including deepfakes, despite various proposals, notably from Judge Paul Grimm and Professor Maura Grossman. Under Daniel J. Capra’s guidance, the Committee believes further development is needed. Critics argue that the dangers posed by deepfakes, particularly in judicial settings, require immediate attention. Professors Andrea Roth and Rebecca Delfino proposed significant changes to enhance judicial gatekeeping over such evidence. The Committee will reconvene on November 8, 2024, to reassess these issues post-election, amidst ongoing debates about the implications of AI in the legal system.
Article Link: The Problem of Deepfakes and AI-Generated Evidence: Is it time to revise the rules of evidence? – Part One | e-Discovery Team
1 post – 1 participant
On April 19, 2024, the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules decided not to enact new rules regarding AI-generated evidence, including deepfakes, despite various proposals, notably from Judge Paul Grimm and Professor Maura Grossman. Under Daniel J. Capra’s guidance, the Committee believes further development is needed. Critics argue that the dangers posed by deepfakes, particularly in judicial settings, require immediate attention. Professors Andrea Roth and Rebecca Delfino proposed significant changes to enhance judicial gatekeeping over such evidence. The Committee will reconvene on November 8, 2024, to reassess these issues post-election, amidst ongoing debates about the implications of AI in the legal system.
Article Link: The Problem of Deepfakes and AI-Generated Evidence: Is it time to revise the rules of evidence? – Part One | e-Discovery Team
1 post – 1 participant
Read full topic
